Camera weight
Dressed in Dirt (I’m subscribed to a number of outdoor blogs, but this one has by far the coolest title!) has an interesting article about the camera weight to take with you on a hike.
I can understand the feeling, I love taking pictures, too. And I’ve made the mistake of taking my DSLR on two longer hikes.
First I carried a Canon 300d with kit lense and tele lense while doing the West Highland Way. It was raining like hell and I got some water on the sensor, most pictures after day 2 needed post processing. Additionally, I carried the camera in my pack most of the time, because the camera bag wasn’t 100% waterproof.
This year I carried the 20d for ten days through Jotunheimen. Again a lot of rain forced me to carry the camera in my pack for quite some time. I was lucky that my better half uses a poncho. Sometimes she carried it, protected by the poncho, which allowed me to quickly reach for the camera.
On the other hand I carried the tiny Canon Ixus 800IS (protected by a crumpler bag) in the front pocket of my hiking shirt on many hikes in the last few years. Keeping it in the front pocket protects the camera from rain and I have zero overhead to get to the camera. The pictures are not SLR quality but I don’t expect this from hiking pictures and the easy access allows me to take a lot more pictures. Additionally I plan to upgrade to Canon S95 once it is available to decrease the difference in quality without sacrificing size and weight.
I will still carry the DSLR every once in a while. But these will be hikes where I intentionally set out to take pictures and will take this into consideration while planning the tour. I don’t want to carry 1.5-2kg of additional gear on an already strenuous hike.

Als ich vor